Monday, March 21, 2011

If I were to get a pair of shoes...


If I were to get a pair of shoes...

Newton Distancia


If you have never heard about Newtons before, they are designed for the midfoot runner. The idea is the lugs seen above are built to return more energy then a conventional running shoe does. Or you could say they are built not to absorb and not return (waste) as much as the conventional shoe. These are very expensive as they usually come in at 150 dollars. I would do most of my training in Vibrams still, and use these for races. However as I do have a few events on trails this summer I will probably not be purchasing these as I do not see the lugs being of much use on the trail. If I was a pure road runner I would consider them more. These are obviously not minimalist shoes, however they do have less of a heel-toe height difference then many shoes, and I would probably make it zero with a knife. You can find more information on these at www.NewtonRunning.com

Mizuno Wave Universe 3


This shoe is super light, weighing in at even less then my Vibrams. They do have 4mm heel-toe height difference so I would probably take a steak knife to the heel and chop some height off, and even more weight :) I believe you are most likely to find these for a bit over 100 dollars. 

Puma Street Kosmos

These are lightweight, quite minimalist, and very flexible. I cannot find any information on the heel to toe drop but I believe it is very minimal. My current pair of Pumas are looking pretty bad, maybe it's time for a new pair anyway! They are only $45 at 6pm.com but generally run about 64 dollars, maybe after the snow and slush is all gone here I'll get a pair for casual ware :)

The reason I have been looking for a pair of shoes is I may need something more then my Vibram Fivefinger Classics for my 50 mile race this summer, as it's a heavy trail run. I am going to go and scout the course sometime, but I am just thinking ahead. 


I just thought this was interesting. A comparison of the theoretical paleolithic diet of man and the modern Standard American Diet. 

Training

Monday March 14
AM 10.5 miles
This was a re-do of the Max Aerobic Function test that I did a couple weeks ago, except this one was done on a treadmill. I was very surprised to find that the results were exactly the same! My pace at 155 beats per minute was actually a few seconds faster per mile than up on the track, but this can be attributed to my much faster mile 1, where I really had to ramp up the speed compared to the rest of the run to get my HR to even avg 153 beats per minute. Taking this mile into account, the results were basically exactly the same. The difference however, was perceived exertion, which was much higher on the treadmill than the track. This is likely due to the lack of wind for cooling and thus more sweat accumulation on my body instead of evaporating. 

Tuesday March 15
AM 5 miles
This morning I did an easy 5 miles with 700 feet of climbing on the treadmill. I knew I would have time to get back to the gym later in the afternoon so I decided to just keep it simple the first time around. I find two a days are much more beneficial than one run. You have a greater EPOC period (aka more time with a raised metabolism) and they do not tire the body as much, so I'm in a better position to run more later!
PM 5 Miles

Wednesday March 16
AM 10 miles in 1:07:45
This was a great run! I was planning on fitting my long downhill run in today but someone was on the only treadmill that goes at a decline so I decided to run up on the track until he finished. Well he ran for an hour and I ran for just over. I decided to simply keep it at 10 today. 
It was very promising as this was a slightly faster pace then I hope to do at the marathon and it felt just fine. I was also coming off an overnight fast and did not fuel or hydrate myself during this 10, and there was no problem. 

Thursday March 17
PM 7 miles cycled in 25 minutes
PM 17 in 3:00:00 at -3 decline
My calves were still a bit sore from yesterday, as fast track runs seem to do that, but I felt pretty good none the less. I want to try to get in one longer downhill run each week. Plus it's a way to do a faster speedwork run that is easier on my body. 

 Friday March 18
AM 4 miles with 1100' vertical
I was still fairly sore from Wed when I ran Thursday. I did not terribly feel like running a lot today, so I just did 4 with a great deal of climbing. After the first mile I started to feel pretty good and it went ok. 

Saturday March 19
PM 7 miles cycling
This was just an easy spin on a indoor bike for a half hour during my lunch break at work.

Totals    Week / Year
Bike         14    /   381
Run         51.5  /    671.8

This was a good week, I was very happy with it. For the future I should try to do that long downhill run on Friday instead of Thursday as I was a bit fatigued going into that last run. 

The 10 miler on Wednesday makes me feel really good about how any future half marathons and full marathons may go. It was a higher pace and still felt very comfortable. 

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

There is no such thing as a vegan, plus my blood lipid results

There is no such thing as a vegan

I had someone send me this image last week. Here was my reply to the farmer:

Veganism is not about abstaining from 100% consuming and using all animal products, as that is obviously not going to happen in this age. It is about removing one self as much as possible from the disgusting cycle of the continued exploitation and suffering of other living creatures. As a plant based ultra distance triathlete that is my goal for continually evolving the health in my life and helping others aspire to the same.

Or you can do nothing and live blissfully ignorant with a lack of awareness, sensitivity, and conscience, Darin. The choice is yours.

Blood Lipid Panel Test

Test                         Value                    Ref. Range
Cholesterol              123 mg/dL            140-199
Triglyceride             48 mg/dL              0-149
HDL                         48 mg/dL              >=41
LDL                          65 mg/dL              <=100
VLDL                       10 mg/dL              0-30

Overall, I was very pleased with the results. I mentioned these to my Advanced Nutrition professor and she said something along the lines of, "excellent, you must have good genes!" I have noticed that she (and other professors) talk about genes genes genes so much. Why can't it be due to a good diet? The 66% of overweight/obese Americans do not simply have bad genes, but if someone is healthy or a really great athlete it is so often due to good genes. Migrant studies go against this gene theory. If you take group of people from one culture with significantly better health then we have here in the US and put them in this country and watch them take on the diet and physical activity characteristics of the US, what happens? They adopt the diseases and health risks of their new home and habits. Showing the impact of a crappy Standard American Diet is more powerful then your genes.